Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Day (2005 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:03, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One Day (2005 film)[edit]

One Day (2005 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film. Fails WP:GNG. All the sources mentioned are websites considered as blogs by WP:ICTF. Searching also does not offer any better sources Jupitus Smart 03:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – the movie is clearly non-notable. I could only find two reliable sources – 1 & 2 – both of which give a passing mention of it. In fact, both of these sources are focussing on this movie's actress - Disha Dinakar. Her article is also up for deletion. We cannot redirect it anywhere, as it's a wrong title. It should have been titled as One Day (2015 film). BTW, this movie's article has been proded before. - NitinMlk (talk) 14:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - it's hard to find sources because of the other films that exist with the same title; that being said, the onus is on proving notability and no evidence of this can be found Spiderone 09:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.