Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneTravel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OneTravel[edit]
- OneTravel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Prodded, but prod removed; non-notable website with no credible assertion or evidence of notability. Orange Mike | Talk 21:58, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Per nom. This article does not adhere to WP:CORP and has no 3rd party sources to assert notability - only has 1 primary source (the official site). ► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 22:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nomination ukexpat (talk) 23:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails N - my search located only 2 instances of mention in reliable sources - a wire story and its reprint, and the only content in that story was a passing reference labeling the company as one of three "small" companies that a major airline no longer booked reservations through.Whatever I had done in my initial search, the google.news link above appears to have additional potential hits that invalidate my claim. Active Banana (bananaphone 00:26, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]- reply - local business press coverage of local firm acquiring this firm; passing mentions in articles on other topics; still doesn't add up to the requisite substantial coverage. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:18, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.