Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oncotype

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --F a ng Aili ^說嗎? 15:52, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oncotype[edit]

Unlikely to be notable, appears to be WP:VSCA. If kept, split and disambig. Stifle (talk) 23:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - this is advertising, but could be turned into a technical medicine piece.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! 03:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I split the article into Oncotype (related to cancer) and Oncotype (Denmark) for the design firm. Someone should nominate the design firm separately if they want to delete it. Oncotype as a term used in cancer research appears to be relatively new (24 PubMed hits) but could very well enter into wide use as the technology to perform gene screening on cancer patients becomes less expensive and more useful in clinical settings. However this article is just an advert. This could either be rewritten or deleted and recreated with non-advertsing content. Thatcher131 11:26, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam without prejudice against subsequent creation of an actual article for the technology Just zis Guy you know? 15:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Oncotype, delete Oncotype (Denmark). Fagstein 03:40, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. It's an ad. First, note no links to here. If the test was truly notable it would be mentioned in context in other articles. The purpose here was advertisement, not education. Second, let me paraphrase the article: "To learn more about Oncotype DX, choose from the option ... Google" Shenme 20:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shenme. --JW1805 (Talk) 17:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.