Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnKey Skypeboard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as advert. --Core desat 21:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OnKey Skypeboard[edit]

^{[Check Google hits]} Borderline advertisement for a non-notable software product. Fails WP:V. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 03:11, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Advert, maybe. But not non notable enough for deletion. Just slap advert tag.~ Feureau 03:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notable product, just need to cleanup, cleanup the advertisement part. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 05:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Changed to delete, after evidence given by other editors. --Ter e nc e Ong _{(C | R)} 13:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Where's the evidence that it's notable? Am I missing something in these Google hits [1] [2], or can you folks point out other appropriate sources? --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 05:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not sufficiently notable for own article. Bwithh 06:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Absolutely no assertion or evidence of notability whatsoever. 9 unique Google hits [3], the first two being this article and the Answers.com mirror. Nothing verified, no sources cited. Border-line speedy as spam. I'm really confused about Feureau and Terence Ong's rationale for keeping. -- IslaySolomon | talk 06:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Quick Delete - don't see any rationale for keep; article fits the {db-spam} criteria for advertising.SkierRMH 09:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reason for keep. Black-Velvet 14:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete First become a topic of interest, then an encyclopedia artile is warrented. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 20:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - spam. —Hanuman Das 00:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Delete as spam. Smacks of advertising and product promotion. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 00:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.