Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On-demand scan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On-demand scan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I propose that this article has no contents. It is just consists of two vague sentences about its subject and links to other articles. It merits speedy-deletion per Criterion 3 for articles: No contents but since one editor has contest the speedy-deletion, I have escalated this issue to AfD. Fleet Command (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC) Fleet Command (talk) 18:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is just a definition of the expression, so WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary applies. The information should be given in articles on virus protection, etc.Borock (talk) 21:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not even that! ;) Fleet Command (talk) 06:55, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable term; WP:DICDEF WP:GNG Chzz ► 05:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.