Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniplan (architects)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omniplan (architects)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged as unreferenced since August 2008.
Appears to fail WP:NCORP in that there does not appear to be significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 13:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Thanks to AllyD for pointing out that they were notable under a previous name; makes the WP:BEFORE search so much easier now! Cheers, ——Serial 13:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:48, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This firm (previously known as Harrell & Hamilton) was included in MoMA's Transformations in Modern Architecture" exhibition in 1979: [1]. Not in itself sufficient to demonstrate notability but indicative of some notice beyond the local. AllyD (talk) 06:52, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per MoMA, as well as several articles in Architect Magazine, The Journal of the American Institute of Architects. Building Centre has featured their work, so has Bloomberg (and by now you're coasting past WP:ORG pretty safely) as well as the Dallas Morning News which is, admittedly, a bit local but then it IS a big city. Add in D Magazine (Dallas again, but, hey) and The Architect's Newspaper and I reckon you're home dry. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: While much of the present article text is brochure-like and in need of pruning (particularly the detail about their work at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center), the company's history includes award-winning buildings in the 1960s (see the references I added to the article), a US diplomatic building commission in Geneva (about which, however, I have been unable to locate significant 3rd-party coverage) and inclusion in the MoMA exhibition in the 1970s, and more recently the Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum (with coverage and also the subject of an award-winning film). Overall, enough I think to indicate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per above sources presented, it should now pass for NCORP. Frigidpolarbear (talk) 16:01, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.