Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniphile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani ^talk 14:52, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Omniphile[edit]

Totally unsourced with a mere 2,680 dubious Google hits. I think it's someone trying to define some sort of indiscriminate pansexual, like Captain Hero. Either way it's not article worthy, except maybe noting that very few "pansexuals" have indiscriminate attraction on its article. ~Zythe^{Talk to me!} 14:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, nonsense. The pansexuality article already covers everything that is true in this article. I for one seriously doubt that anyone has a sexual attraction towards moths. (if you do, please don't reply to this..) yandman 14:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:BOLLOCKS. Moreschi 15:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Drivel. Suspect blend of Latin and Greek too. --Folantin 15:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Moreschi. However, there are a lot of Latin-Greek blends (or bastardizations), e.g. television. This is non-notable no matter the language of the parent words. --Charlene 16:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing to add to the above !votes, which sum it ujp nicely. Guy (Help!) 23:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nonesense. Rever e ndG 05:51, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.