Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniconvert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy Speedy delete. (non-admin closure) MassiveYR ♠ 18:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Omniconvert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. No repeated coverage to establish any notability. Writing purpose is promotion and advertorials. reads like a brochure or corporate spam. Light2021 (talk) 17:27, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as unambiguous promotion. Article declined at AfC multiple times and was move to main space by the article creator (Special:Contributions/HDobre). Content is strictly promotional such as: "The Omniconvert platform provides companies the opportunity to conduct A/B testing experiments, collect data with surveys on site and personalize the users’ experience based on behavior[2][3]!" etc. I requested a speedy deletion under G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.