Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmniROM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OmniROM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of general notability, only passing reference in sources, International Business Times only covers custom ROMs to influence search results in my opinion ViperSnake151 Talk 22:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I thought this page looked familiar – I voted to keep it last time it came up on AfD. In fact, it looks like I was the one who located many of the sources. Sure, consensus can change, but I think I fairly conclusively established notability for this article. Additionally, a Google News search for OmniROM returns a few more sources. I freely admit that it's not a very good article, but I'm actually a bit surprised an article that I've edited would come up for deletion. I'm not exactly known for being an inclusionist. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 08:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's been through some clean-up since I originally created the article as I was reviewing the main candidates for alternatives to CyanogenMod. While some of the background has been removed or pushed to the references it does make the article more NPOV. As NinjaRobotPirate says it needs some additional work to make it a more worthwhile article but I don't think it warrents being deleted now. Alex (talk) 11:21, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The notability of the article has already been established, per comments above. Meanwhile, the article indeed needs more work. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 11:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is a product the same as many other famous ROMs for android. Starting from a technical viewpoint, even CyanogenMod doesn't have an exclusive forum in XDA-Developers, but OmniROM does. If we can accept articles like AOKP or MIUI, I can't understand why to delete OmniROM. Kou Dou (talk) 15:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.