Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omer Eshel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Omer Eshel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, claims significance but fails WP:POLITICIAN and WP:CREATIVE. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 05:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 05:20, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has a lot of sources. However I'm ignoring the interviews and the announcements of appointments because he is an "emissary" or basically a PR representative for Israel and will of course be giving interviews and announcements of appointments as part of the job. What's needed is independent sourcing about Eshel, not sources that would likely exist for whoever held the position. A search of site:.il turns up very little as well including Hebrew. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 02:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although personally, I would like to recommend keeping the article. I am a Jew who has visited Israel twice, and off-Wikipedia, would likely be positive to him. However, though I am sure that he is a fine person, he is also simply nothing more than a second-tier consular official tasked with promoting tourism to Israel within a region of the United States. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 06:45, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
keep this article I think that we are missing the point here... it is about his "out of the box" activities, I watched the Biblical series he made - The Bible Comes to Life, and I think it is brilliant, not something a typical "civil servant" would create. I understand why he got the "Rising Stars" award. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colombus1492 (talk • contribs) 14:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.