Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OmegaWiki

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. So Why 07:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OmegaWiki[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per source searches, does not meet WP:GNG. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've tagged it for notability few weeks ago and nothing has been done to address the issue. Non-notable site/project. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.