Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omega-3 Fatty Acids Nomenclature - Ralph T. Holman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Omega-3 Fatty Acids Nomenclature - Ralph T. Holman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page consists of a small explanation of the who came up with the nomenclature and a discussion saying it was not included in the main article. More appropriate on the Talk:Omega-3 fatty acid talk page and where appropriate in that article. Declined prod. noq (talk) 19:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article appears to rely heavily on the use of other Wikipedia articles as sources. If Ralph Holman is notable, then he ought to be the subject of an article about his own achievements, rather than an article about whether his accomplishments are recognized in other Wikipedia articles. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is messy a mix of a biography and work product, via synthesis, pardon the pun. Even if kept, it would have to be split and each part renamed. I'm not convinced that either part is notable, that is the named and namer. Bearian (talk) 18:32, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per above, does not meet WP:GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I enjoy sandwiches (talk • contribs)
Delete. Not notable (among other things). This is the author's first article. I will try and help 39Arnejaa19 (talk · contribs) to achieve what they're trying to achieve (which I think ultimately is an edit to Omega-3 fatty acid) via their Talk page. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - If he meets WP:BIO, Ralph T. Holman could be the subject of his own article. The present article is messy and un-encyclopedic and should be deleted, but some of the information could be merged into Omega-3 fatty acid. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with above reasoning. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:19, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.