Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Spahi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Spahi[edit]

Omar Spahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of this actually solidly convinces the applicable notability, notable coverage sources is not acceptable for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 17:31, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 17:32, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 03:16, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Reliable secondary sources independent of the subject I found were limited to [1], [2]. That's it. There are a bunch of sources on one particular WP:SPS, but it cannot be used for notability. At this point fails WP:GNG --Lemongirl942 (talk) 14:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.