Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivier Jarda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:58, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Olivier Jarda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minimally sourced WP:BLP of a musician, with no real claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC besides the fact that he and his music exist. Full disclosure, I'm actually the original creator here, back when our inclusion standards for musicians were a lot looser than they are in 2017, and being able to single-source the fact that the musician existed was usually enough -- but the amount of advertorial abuse to which the old approach opened us up led us to considerably tighten up the inclusion and sourcing standards for musicians, and this guy just doesn't have a strong enough notability claim or strong enough sourcing to pass the inclusion test as it now stands. Bearcat (talk) 02:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:53, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since the article creator (exprienced admin) feels it no longer satisfy current inclusion standards, it should be deleted. Plus its history shows it didn't get any sugnificant input from others (since creation in 2010) –Ammarpad (talk) 04:09, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.