Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Yates (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 09:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oliver Yates[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only claim to notability is being an unelected candidate in a previous Australian federal election. Fails WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG. GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, and Australia. GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Running unsuccessfully in an election is not a claim to notability. AusLondonder (talk) 10:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only sources that I could find that might prove notability were all from daily mail, which is a deprecated source. Nagol0929 (talk) 12:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I don't think violating parliamentary privilege is notable, the rest of his career appears routine. There's coverage of this person, but I'm not sure what he's done is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Was !deleted 1.5 yrs ago as not meeting notability for politicians. The political violation now described in the article isn't rising to the level of criminal notability. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete was previously deleted and not seeing much has changed. Fails WP:NPOL as a political candidate. LibStar (talk) 23:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates, but this article is not making any other meaningful claim of notability that would have gotten him into Wikipedia for other reasons. Bearcat (talk) 20:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.