Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivehill, Tennessee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Olivehill, Tennessee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:LOCAL. Google search shows nothing of note. Bibliopole5795 (talk) 03:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is a real population center with all the addresses officially designated at "Olivehille, Tennessee."[1] Officially recognized as a census designated place by the US Census with a population of 3,697 in 2000.[2] Oakshade (talk) 07:43, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:58, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Oakshade - populated place so should be kept per WP:PLACEOUTCOMES Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:40, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GEOLAND as legally recognized place. See [3] for recent use (dispite mis-spelling). 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per above, passes WP:GEOLAND guidelines as legally recognized place. Pilean (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Definitely a legitimate community. This wouldn't quite pass the WP:SCHOLARSHIP muster, but the fact that's there's a significant-length master's thesis written specifically about this community further demonstrates that this is a real community of some significance. Hog Farm _Talk 04:35, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The relevant guideline is WP:GEOLAND as listed above, and this location meets that. Unincorporated community articles are common, as you can see at Category:Unincorporated communities in the United States. Redoryxx (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Definitely a settlement, and unincorporated community articles are common on Wikipedia. Has sources to back it up. Knightoften (talk) 21:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.