Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Ravn

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 13:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Olga Ravn[edit]

Olga Ravn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much evidence of notability; couldn't find much on web beyond facebook and pinterest. valereee (talk) 13:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  13:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  13:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Valereee. She's certainly one of the most notable authors in Denmark at the moment. The problem is you are searching in English-language sources. If you search in Danish you will find many references in the large-circulation national newspapers such as Berlingske and Politiken. For example:
She also received a very positive introduction in the English-language Danish Literary Magazine (Autumn 2013). See the write-up on Page 28 here
I could give you many, many more citations in Danish if you cannot find them yourself. I only devoted a short article to Olga Ravn at this stage but it could well be expanded. I am up to my neck with an editathon on women architects at the moment but I can see there's quite a bit more we could add to the article on Ravn.--Ipigott (talk) 13:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Ipigott I'm totally willing to take your word for it; it might be good to include these other references when you've unburied yourself? :) I did go to the two currently listed and they looked like simple listings of writers rather than evidence of notability. valereee (talk) 13:58, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Valereee: Thanks for your quick response. I've already added a snippet and will get back to it later. The problem is you cannot cover all these people in great detail from the word go.--Ipigott (talk) 14:03, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ipigott No deadlines. :D valereee (talk) 14:05, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.