Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga Kharitidi (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kevin (talk) 00:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Olga Kharitidi[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Olga Kharitidi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet any of the notability criteria in WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. The previous nomination (back in 2006) ended as a keep for the sole reason that her books are available on Amazon, which is not a criterion for notability as far as I know. All the refs are her own work, and I can find no evidence that she has made a significant impact on higher education. Kafziel Complaint Department 00:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any significant secondary coverage either. Smartse (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sometimes I see an article about an author with a recent book, and I wonder whether there will soon be coverage in reliable sources, but her books go back over a decade. If she isn't getting any RS coverage, then merely having published books doesn't make her Notable --SPhilbrickT 15:07, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - doesn't appear to be any significant, reliable coverage by third-parties. Cocytus [»talk«] 19:36, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.