Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oleg Czougeda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 04:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oleg Czougeda[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Too many problems. Poorly copied from the French WP. Best to delete and start again. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 10:55, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 18:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling of this article's title appears to be a strange hybrid, with the "Cz" suggesting a transliteration into Polish and the "ouge" into French. A more standard transliteration into English would be Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The UCI Road World Championships results very clearly meet WP:NCYCLING and, while the online results don't seem to show it, his 1984 win in the Milk Race should almost guarantee WP:GNG - at that time, British newspapers gave the Milk Race a lot of coverage. As Phil Bridger notes, the spelling of the surname in the article title is a very odd transcription - but it does seem to have been common in Britain at the time of his Milk Race win (see the one GBooks result on the standard search for confirmation). However, plenty of other transcriptions were also being used, so it might make sense to move the article to a more standard one. As for the standard of the article - it is distinctly poor but almost certainly easier to improve from where it is now than to compile again completely from scratch. PWilkinson (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 23:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This person appears to pass WP:NCYCLING. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:48, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.