Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ole Brunell

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Unanimous consensus to keep.--JForget 00:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ole Brunell[edit]

Ole Brunell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This person does not seem to have any significant media coverage. Divamia (talk) 04:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


It's just one article, and not all authors are notable. Divamia (talk) 05:33, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Baltimore's Jewish Family Magazine mentions him http://www.wherewhatwhen.com/read_articles.asp?id=36--Java7837 (talk) 12:51, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Where? Are there any details? Divamia (talk) 15:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete for lack of news coverage from RS unless any of the Finnish sources are reliable. I can't read the language. Travellingcari (talk) 12:50, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ETA : I found one book, which was also cited by another. Again it's a language issue to judge the publisher, etc. Travellingcari (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Change to keep based on sources found. Travellingcari (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Source above found at Arutz Sheva here [1]. There is a second source at [2] by the Jewish Press. The article specifically deals with the subject. These two articles, I believe, meet the bare necessity of two reliable sources on the subject. Culturalrevival (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. There might be more reliable sources if his current name was known. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 00:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did a google search for Shlomo Brunell it came up with many results Shlomo is the name he took upon converting see http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=Shlomo+Brunell&btnG=Google+Search and http://www.google.com/search?q=Shlomo+Brunell&hl=en&safe=off&start=10&sa=N --Java7837 (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep Two sources listed above. Ism schism (talk) 05:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep based on sources found. --MPerel 07:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep since he meets all the basic requirements as proven by above editors. Also, User Shirahadasha (talk · contribs) had once noted [3] in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaim Dov Keller that: "...Religious sources and media of notable religious organizations are perfectly acceptable reliable sources to establish notability of religious subjects and figures. Notability in the field, not notability in general media, is the standard, and that is met here. There is no problem I can see that can justify a delete vote..." and the same applies here. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. IZAK (talk) 11:52, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, rename to Shlomo Brunell. given the sources found so far. I've added the three that appear to be the most reliable of the group to the article (suggest editors add sources to the article as they find them). It looks like he's more notable in English as Shlomo Brunell rather than Ole Brunell. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ole_Brunell&oldid=1085515664"