Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older Than We Are
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —freak(talk) 11:05, Dec. 29, 2006 (UTC)
Older Than We Are[edit]
Was on prod, prod was removed with no comment. Book is unpublished. No Ghits, no ISBN, author Zayne Beauclerk no Ghits. Fails Wikipedia:Notability (books) on every criteria, also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Dakota 03:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete: "It was is being written by Zayne Beauclerk. It is not yet published." And I doubt it ever will be, at that rate. Page is promotional. Daniel Case 04:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Unpublished original creation with no referenced assertion of notability; WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NOT#OR. --Muchness 04:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable, no reliable sources, crystal ball. -- Whpq 04:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete as repost (not a G4 - previous deletion was speedy). See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Older than we are for previous AfD. Tevildo 04:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for above, and apparent WP:COI problems ("I found names" or "I got"). Apparently this author User talk:Pine marten put up several articles about her own books and characters therein. SkierRMH 04:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I, personally, am rooting for the lumber company. Herostratus 05:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. - as above. Tonytypoon 05:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:VERIFY. But the Redwood picture is beautiful. ^_^ JRHorse 05:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT#OR -- Bec-Thorn-Berry 06:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per rationale at previous AfD (above), and kindly ask User:Pine marten (again) to read the five pillars and to refrain from creating articles which are WP:COI and WP:V issues. --Kinu t/c (éŕ) 06:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 07:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V, WP:COI, and WP:BK. --Metropolitan90 07:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced crystal balling. —ShadowHalo 08:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. MER-C 10:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.