Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olayemi Esan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:16, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Olayemi Esan[edit]

Olayemi Esan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable blogger/media consultant lacking non-trivial, independent sources. No independent support for the minor awards. A good number of the "references" are from subject's blog. reddogsix (talk) 19:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Note-the editor that created this article continues to add unrelated "references." reddogsix (talk) 04:30, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:15, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete excellent nomination, per that, non-notable nearly won an award, but based solely on trivia. — fortunavelut luna 06:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businesswoman. Created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Nothing of note to meet WP:ANYBIO. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 07:46, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as not sufficiently notable, and lacking any RS sources to show notability. This does not mean the person can not become notable, only that the BLP does not meet Wikipedia guidelines at this point. Collect (talk) 13:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.