Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okinawa Coral
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 05:42, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okinawa Coral[edit]
- Okinawa Coral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This article is yet another pov fork of Coral calcium, started without any discussion. The entire article is dubious at this point, poorly referenced, with unverifiable if not inaccurate claims. Editors are already edit-warring over tags in the article. Ronz (talk) 17:38, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coral Calcium Claims and Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive343#User:Magnonimous.2F24.36.201.161 --Ronz (talk) 17:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Very close to being spam. --Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 17:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I agree with User:Blanchardb, this is close to being spam and is almost certainly a WP:COATRACK for a commercial "nutraceutical" of some dubious sort. I would dislike seeing Wikipedia adding verisimilitude to an otherwise unconvincing narrative of that sort. Accounting4Taste:talk 19:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Crap, spam, delete! Masterpiece2000 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 10:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - please note that two of the creators, Jerome709 (talk · contribs) and Magnonimous (talk · contribs) have exposed themselves as sock puppets and I'd bet eleventy billion dollars that MoonLightGlory (talk · contribs) is too. --B (talk) 20:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete , snake-spam-oil (Yummy!), seems to exist only to bolster somebody's dubious product. Ronabop (talk) 02:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.