Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: Part 2 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:08, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: Part 2[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sent to Draft, returned; redirected, reverted. So here we are. Unsourced, non-notable part 2 of series Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!, which article covers this topic more than adequately reflecting its independent notability. Clearly consensus now needed to either redirect without fear of reversion or delete. Personally, I'd commend the latter to your excellencies... Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, and Philippines. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:44, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There may be offline sources I can’t see but it doesn’t seem notable to me. There is a perfectly adequate article on the whole series so if there’s no consensus to delete a redirect would be ok. Mccapra (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or redirect to Okay Ka, Fairy Ko!: The Movie. This version of the article may give a better idea of why. The last Afd was not that long ago (July 31!!!) and things haven't changed. Please note that this is a feature film and not a part of the TV series. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 07:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I missed that AfD, not sure how, 'cause I'd have gone G4 if I'd have realised... Redirect was reverted, hence AfD... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:05, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Except G4 Speedy deletion applies to pages that were deleted and the consensus here was for a merge. I have an opinion on the page (above) but no opinion on renominating the page; still, this essay, that I am sure you know, might be of interest. Best, -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let me have my fun. I'm imagining a G4... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:59, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My vote would go towards a redirect, because while the movie exists, stars well-known actors and (from what I remember) was a blockbuster, it's really hard to come up with (online) sources about this movie. A redirect will be better. ---Tito Pao (talk) 09:27, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restore redirect: per the first AfD. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 10:14, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested is fine, nothing has changed in the last month that makes it now more notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:50, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Restore redirect per above --Lenticel ^(talk) 07:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If possible, salt the article until notability has been found (unless this AfD is not closed as keep). The creator JuanTejada19 keeps on restoring the article despite the result of the first AfD and this seems disruptive. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 09:28, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.