Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okay (song)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:33, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay (song)[edit]

Okay (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This does not appear to have significant coverage from third-party, reliable sources (I could only find a small review from Vibe magazine). It has charted, but it does not seem to have much in the way of actual information. Aoba47 (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Aoba47 (talk) 19:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC))[reply]
  • Comment. Are you proposing that this is deleted or merged to the album article? If the latter, please withdraw your nomination and start a merge discussion on the article's talk page. --Michig (talk) 05:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just wanted to say that I thought merge was also a valid option as well. I have removed the sentence, as I am proposing deletion instead. Thank you for the note. Aoba47 (talk) 10:16, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 14:29, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Delete the page, but redirect the name per WP:NSONG "Songs that do not rise to notability for an independent article should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song." No need for merging as it is already included in Nivea discography. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.