Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh Long Johnson (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Reasonably strong consensus to Keep, but Keeep was also a possibility. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:34, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Long Johnson (album)[edit]

Oh Long Johnson (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, just like the article on Oh Long Johnson. TheAwesomeHwyh 22:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 22:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. TheAwesomeHwyh 22:14, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't. Not in the slightest. -The Gnome (talk) 21:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keeep since subject, for better or worse, satisfies WP:NALBUMS #2, in that it has charted in Spain's national chart (see here). In fact, it reached the top position. -The Gnome (talk) 21:11, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Number 1 album in Spain is clearly going to be notable. --Michig (talk) 12:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Agreed. I think we now have consensus. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.