Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OggConvert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OggConvert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a simple and non-notable tool. Completely unsourced article of three sentences. Miami33139 (talk) 23:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:28, 10 December 2009 (UTC)OggConvert[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:26, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Non N free software. Mattg82 (talk) 02:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Dime-a-dozen conversion utility. No evident notability to be found. JBsupreme (talk) 07:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.