Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ogembo Javier
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 04:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ogembo Javier[edit]
- Ogembo Javier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails wp:prof, orphaned, reads more like a CV. Babakathy (talk) 13:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Aside from severe content problems (it's a vanity page), page is about a non-notable researcher. I looked up "Sambaza Group," of which he is president, and found zero news coverage via gnews. Jlg4104 (talk) 14:10, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apart from vanity issues, the publications made by this person are not widely cited or recognized. Zero results under news search. LeaveSleaves 19:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; doesn't appear to have significant third-party coverage. --Delirium (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —John Z (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Appears to be a researcher at the start of his career (it's not even clear he's gained his PhD yet); Google Scholar finds no citations for the four published research papers, which are in very specialised journals.[1] I see no evidence the subject meets WP:PROF at this time. The Sambaza Group seems to be a small organisation founded in 2006; it has received a limited amount of press coverage eg [2]. I don't think it would yet merit an article, and it certainly isn't sufficient to confer notability on its co-founder. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:07, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Practically no independent coverage of Mr. Ogembo or the Sambaza Group. May become notable in the future, as he is involved in interesting iniatives, but certainly not yet there.--Eric Yurken (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Espresso Addict and Eric Yurken cover the situation well. Not notable. Tim Ross (talk) 14:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per Espresso Addict and Eric Yurken. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO at the moment. Nsk92 (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.