Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Official Karate Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Official Karate Magazine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Magazine is not significant even in what it covers. All sources avaliable briefly mention what the magazine does but not much else. No significant coverage is given beyond passing mentions. ALongStay (talk) 04:56, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:12, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Magazine exists but has no significant independent coverage and no indication of notability.Mdtemp (talk) 15:49, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The lack of significant coverage is why this doesn't meet WP:GNG. I think it's hard for niche publications to generate the coverage needed to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 01:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.