Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odlotowewakacje.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odlotowewakacje.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Substub on a dot com business website, without any proof of notaiblity. Unreferenced, first and only edit of a new user, prod nom removed by an anon shortly afterwards. Seems like WP:SPAM or related... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:26, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was also included in the Bilateral relations sorting, which I do not understand. Anyway, speedy delete.--TM 13:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That listing was by mistake. It has been reverted. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. An online travel agency without any indication that it has ever done anything with historical, technical, or cultural significance. Using the word "e-tailer" results in an automatic penalty of -10 points of notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable website. Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 02:12, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The only coverage in reliable sources I was able to find was this passing mention. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.