Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octavia Taylor (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Zachary Taylor. Randykitty (talk) 16:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Octavia Taylor[edit]

Octavia Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no sign subject was noted for anything of her own merit (meaning outside of family connections). Per WP:NOTGENEALOGY, WP:NOTINHERITED, and WP:BIO, she doesn't warrant a standalone article. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Merge the bit about the impact of the deaths on their parents, especially their father, into his article. WP:NOTINHERITED RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not notable on her own. She died at age 4, in an era when children of celebrities were not heavily covered, her father was a rising man in the military but not yet a war hero or top ranked politician. Her life and death can be mentioned in the article on her father, but it is not worth mentioning in a stand alone article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep this nom is just an attempt to bolster the nominators effort to delete George Bush's daughter's page, after this page was used as a precident for creation of that page. Subject is a historic figure and trying to merge her page into an already large page on her father is not appropriate. Even if normally this would not be a stand alone page it is an appropriate WP:SPINOUT. Legacypac (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Bushes have nothing to do with this nomination. Please stay focused on the article's subject here and her own family. There's nothing of value here that can't be concisely summarized (a paragraph at most) in President Taylor's page. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 19:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 23:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:37, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.