Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octagonal trapezohedron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Trapezohedron. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 05:30, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Octagonal trapezohedron[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same as with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Decagonal trapezohedron and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodecagonal trapezohedron, only trivial information inferred from the general case of a trapezohedron, no significant coverage of this individual instance. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Trapezohedron as a generic instance of an infinite family. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect until such time as someone wants to write an article including information that is not of the form "here is a general rule about a certain class of polyhedra, instantiated at a particular number of sides". --JBL (talk) 19:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.