Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Octacube (puzzle)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 07:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Octacube (puzzle)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage and no references in the article. The external link is an unreliable source. SL93 (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I cannot find evidence for significant coverage. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 04:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. There is no evidence of significant coverage either inside or outside the article. Chetsford (talk) 05:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above arguments. SportingFlyer talk 07:04, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.