Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ochani Lele
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ochani Lele[edit]
- Ochani Lele (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced autobiography by non-notable person Orange Mike | Talk 02:16, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:GNG. Guoguo12--Talk-- 02:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- General Comment. The article's original author is also its subject so there's a fairly clear-cut conflict of interest here. The name 'Lele' is a pen-name of another author - according to this article. I checked the publisher's website - Inner Traditions - and everything is legit...but I do wonder just how notable the subject is without independent sources. Eddie.willers (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- response - but COI in and of itself is not grounds for deletion, nor am I asserting that it is. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:13, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable per the WP:GNG. -- roleplayer 10:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No independent sources whatsoever. GBooks has never heard of the subject. The lone GNews hits is a minor passing mention that might be a false positive. Edward321 (talk) 05:21, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per OrangeMike and WP:GNG .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.