Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obscurity (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obscurity (album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bootleg, one unreliable source. The notability claims in this article (e.g. the length of one of the songs) do not constitute notability per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:59, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, no mergeable content. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:10, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Well kept article with a lot of sources popping up if you actually googled it. Str8cash (talk) 23:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:24, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nota bene: [1] --87.79.143.161 (talk) 00:12, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:VERIFY and WP:GNG. I'm a Pink Floyd fan, but there's no evidence this album has received significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources. Would be very happy to be proven wrong on this one, but I couldn't find anything myself. — Satori Son 14:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.