Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obama India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete G12 by Athaenara. Non-admin closure. MuZemike (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obama India[edit]
- Obama India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. I'm not sure how to categorize this, but it seems like a blantant violation of wp:npov - NuclearWarfare contact meMy work 03:45, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:SOAP and WP:OR. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as prodder. Blatant opinion piece, original research, your pick. Also, I am not aware of the existence of an entity called "Obama India." No mention of such an entity can be found in the article. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 03:54, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, as the article appears to be cut-and-pasted from it's sources. Tagged as copyvio. Dchall1 03:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per everyone. - ÆÅM «(fætsøn!) 04:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--what a [deleted] piece of poorly written, unsourced/stolen, opinionated, fictional prose. Yes, all that at the same time. Drmies (talk) 04:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. The source can always be used elsewhere, doesn't appear to need a whole page. Mathmo Talk 04:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this essay. It's unsourced and appears to contain original research and unverifiable speculation. Majoreditor (talk) 04:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.