Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis (Kitaro album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Kitarō discography. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oasis (Kitaro album)[edit]
- Oasis (Kitaro album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no evidence that this is notable. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Ancient Journey. Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Kitarō discography. Even if there's no individual coverage of this album, the artist and his collective body of work are notable, and this appears to be a plausible search term for those familiar with our naming conventions. Plus, redirects are cheap. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not seeing any reliable third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage to satisfy WP:NALBUMS. This is just a track listing. --DAJF (talk) 00:13, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- redirect and merge to the already-existing Kitarō discography instead, as per all the others as well. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 06:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.