Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Engage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:38, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oak Engage[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, possibly paid PR sources Sliekid (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sliekid (talk) 12:08, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Vanity piece on a non-notable ROTM business. The sources, such as they are, are press release regurgitations. Once you strip out the COI promo fluff, nothing of encyclopaedic value remains. Fails WP:GNG / WP:COMPANY. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches on both this and the previous OrchidSoft name find passing mentions, routine listings, and investment announcement coverage, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. A company going about its business, but I am not seeing evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:02, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:16, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.