Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O goshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O goshi[edit]

Judo move of questionable notability. I do not feel that specific moves within a martial arts discipline, unless of particular note, deserve their own page. Also, WP:NOTHOWTO. Tyrenon (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the basic throws of Judo, an Olympic sport, are highly notable. This may be the most well-known of them. They have been written about extensively. They should be treated as are tactics/techniques from other sports. JJL (talk) 18:00, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Disruptive nomination for which the nominator has been banned from AFD. The topic has good notability as the article already contains sources and more are readily available. And there are obvious alternatives to deletion such as merger into a more general article about judo. The nomination is mainly an expression of personal opinion as it provides no evidence to support its assertions. It seems that none of the sensible process described at WP:BEFORE has been followed - no discussion, no tagging, nothing more than a cookie cutter, drive-by. The discussion should be closed immediately to spare us unnecessary drama and wasted effort. Colonel Warden (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Jujutsu. Short descriptions of every known move are not needed as separate articles, and would be far easier for readers to find in a main article. BTW, NPA should be observed. Collect (talk) 13:37, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep well sourced as a Judo technique and one of the bread and butter moves of the sport, equivalent of not having an article on Forward pass. --Nate 14 81 11:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.