Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O Nanna Nalle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

O Nanna Nalle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article includes no references to support a notability claim. Without the addition of multiple, reliable, independent, and nontrivial sources, Wikipedia cannot retain such an article. KDS4444^Talk 15:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:58, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Indeed the article looks very bad, but it's a movie by a famous director, with a famous lead actress, and it was a hit at the box office. Biwom (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDAFD: "O Nanna Nalle"

Keep this brand new suitable stub on notable topic... a released film that has received review and commentary in multiple reliable sources. Nominator, a topic's notability is NOT determined by sources being used, but instead rather by sources BEING AVAILABLE, used or not. And just a little due diligence quickly finds Sify Rediff Sify and others. WP:NF is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:40, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:28, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appears to satisfy two important criteria: (1) Film that's completed filming. (2) Has received good deal secondary source coverage. — Cirt (talk) 09:43, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.