Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OX Group (UK)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OX Group (UK)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company that fails WP:N for lack of coverage in reliable sources. All the references in the article are non-independent or trade publications, and web and news search does not reveal enough coverage to meet our inclusion standards per WP:ORG. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:19, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete gnews reveals 1 line mentions mainly in industry publications. LibStar (talk) 06:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Neither this UK subsidiary nor the Australian parent firm looks notable. The article contains no claim of notability and the sole 3rd party source is merely noting that the firm employed a sand sculptor for their stand at an industry fair. My searches are finding nothing better: fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete corporate spam failing CORPDEPTH, terms of use violation too. jcc (tea and biscuits) 11:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.