Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OPlatz (Oranienplatz) Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Meatsgains (talk) 02:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OPlatz (Oranienplatz) Movement[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 19:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that even in the German Wikipedia, OPlatz is simply mentioned in de:Flüchtlingsproteste in Deutschland ab 2012. If you're checking on Google, care must be taken to distinguish from the city square from which the organization draws its name. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mkdw ^talk 17:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep My searches quickly turned up "movement" sources, like Occupy [1], but also major news outlets symathetic to this "movement"'s goals, like The Guardian [2] and Al Jazeera [3]. It does seem to have been a significant thing, during an Occupy-like protest encampment in this significant Berlin public space between 2012 and 2014. I suggest that we tag it for improvement, and hope a reliable editor undertakes to do so.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:46, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.