Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OMSI 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List_of_simulation_video_games#Bus_simulation. MBisanz ^talk 12:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OMSI 2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No credible indication of notability. A Google search finds only listings for sale and some YouTube videos showing people playing. Nothing that meets the requirements of WP:GNG. Gronk Oz (talk) 14:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some approved sources based on the VG/S search. It's an edge case for notability, so I'll lean weak keep. --Izno (talk) 23:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:40, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced yet - of those six references, four of them are all from a single source (Rock, Paper, Shotgun). The one from kotaku is just four sentences, and the final one from GRY my security software won't even let me see because it is black-listed. Maybe it is brilliant, but I'm not prepared to take the risk. It would be nice to hear from somebody else - would anybody from WP:VG care to comment? --Gronk Oz (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
They're all vetted sources. The Kotaku article isn't so much an article as a video article--hence why the YouTube video is embedded. I have no issue with the GRY article myself, so perhaps you have some particularly sensitive addon that you're using. Regardless, it's weak, and there's probably only notability for the pair of games OMSI and OMSI 2 rather than one or the other, since some of those sources are for the former rather than the latter. --Izno (talk) 05:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Izno (talk) 13:21, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List_of_simulation_video_games#Bus_simulation as a valid search term. With no major reviews and after reading through the sources (which are from vetted, reliable publishers), I don't see how we'd have enough material to write a full treatment of this topic. czar 08:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as user:Czar suggests. The references given do not demonstrate significant coverage in RS. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.