Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OLM.net

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 21:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OLM.net[edit]

OLM.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really my area of expertise, but I couldn't establish that they meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. This has been tagged for notability for 7 years, so hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 14:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:03, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Business Wire is simply a collection of news releases, and the bankruptcy citation is Original research. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 05:27, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Wasn't able to find sources meeting CORPDEPTH. A lot of advertising, a shout out in a book about art marketing, press releases, but not WP:CORP. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.