Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OBERLINER
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OBERLINER[edit]
- OBERLINER (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Magazine of only local importance, no claim to notability in the article, so far only primary sources used; a cursory search on google did not let me find reliable sources Lectonar (talk) 20:21, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- addendum: strong indication of WP:COI by IP 178...., see article history. Lectonar (talk) 20:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have added third party references now and will keep improving the information. Please consider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.5.215.147 (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:15, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:NMAG. This is a small, local publication less than two years old. Particularly of note is the (now removed) job posting in the article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 10:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No media presence except self-promotion. No awards etc. Far short of WP:NMAG.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.