Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O. Henry Pun-Off

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 08:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

O. Henry Pun-Off[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable competition with only one refernce that does not even seem to mention the competion and a good chunk of the article is a list of winners. Also the rules section seems to be a copyvio of punoff.com/pun-off-rules with just some extra words sprinkled in. might be notable in the long run but the article would require extesive rewriting as it reads more like an eassy then an article TheMesquito^buzz 21:14, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. TheMesquito^buzz 21:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep but reduce (and remove any copyvio). [1] [2] [3] should be enough coverage. power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to William Sidney Porter House. Anything that is sourced here could easily be integrated in the sparse paragraph there. The description of the rules and the list of winners are likely copyright violations and are wholly unnecessary in an encyclopedia. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sources such as those presented by power~enwiki; AfD is not clean-up. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 20:08, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.