Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Rorke Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:00, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O'Rorke Hall[edit]

Individual university residential halls is not notable enough, merge to List of University of Auckland residential halls or some such thing Madcoverboy (talk) 18:35, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Madcoverboy (talk) 18:36, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to University of Auckland#Accommodation. Section can be expanded to include basica information, I agree there is no need for a separate article as notability (any references that are found during this debate will change my mind) is not established. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:50, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect first paragraph only to University of Auckland#Accommodation. The Hall has a long history but not enough to make it notable in its own right, and most of the current article is just a repeat of the University page on the hall. I think there's potential for an article to be spun off from University of Auckland#Accommodation on all the residential halls, but that article would have to deal with the history and development of each rather than being a list of current facilities.-gadfium 20:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Redirect - Individual residence halls are not notable. Sources are very week --T-rex 20:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. Don't redirect, that would be silly. CRGreathouse (t | c) 17:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirects are free. Obviously, there's at least one person that thought that typing "O'Rorke Hall" should lead them somewhere other than a "this page does not exist". It helps stymie recreation of a non-notable residence hall down the road as well when faced with a redlink. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 17:59, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - The !votes seem to support adding a redirect, so one should probably be created -- but I don't think one should be; it's far too trivial. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is conspicuously absent. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.