Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O'Donnell & Associates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:10, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O'Donnell & Associates[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional and poorly sourced article on an organization with less than 100 employees. There does not appear to be enough salvageable material in the current article to be worth keeping it. CorporateM (Talk) 15:03, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:54, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails both WP:CORPDEPTH as a company, and WP:PROF and WP:BLP as a bio of the lead employee/ academic publisher. This company might have lots of major clients, but WP:NOTINHERITED directs us to eliminate business vendors and persons who are notable only by dint of association with notable entities. A small company or publisher can be notable, but not yet in this case. There is so much peacock langauge in the article, that it would have to be started from scratch in order to be a real article. We are not a webhost or PR network for small businesses. Bearian (talk) 18:46, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.