Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NuvoSonic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:46, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NuvoSonic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page was prodded because there is evidence that the firm NuvoSonic has closed down: "I can find no evidence of the continued existence of this company. Both external links are dead, the domain is up for sale, and http://www.trademarkia.com/seascout-78396357.html says that the tradename has been abandoned. May not have been Notable in any case, but defunct, it's certainly not Notable.". But it is part of the history of diver-detection techniques which are a significant part of underwater anti-frogman precautions, and describes ultrasound diver-detection techniques which are so used. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:02, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete I see no evidence that anyone cared about the products of this now-defunct company. Mangoe (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:00, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above. Would the creator like to explain why he created this page? Xxanthippe (talk) 21:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
It is part of the topic of anti-frogman precautions and underwater intruder detection and thus of underwater security in general. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answer. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:37, 29 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.