Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nutcache

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nutcache[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A typical company made by people. Nothing notable or significant about it, no sources are notable. used wikipedia to create profile or directory. Light2021 (talk) 15:42, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:56, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most of the existing sources seem borderline as reliable third-party sources. For example, business.com article has a named author independent of Nutcache, and the publication has editors. I found an enterpreneur.com article with coverage of Nutcache probably usable as RS. So that's not enough yet, but maybe somebody else can find more. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:03, 25 July 2017 (UTC) Update: looking at the revision history, looks like it's only had one major contributor and they have only contributed to this article and other articles that have been deleted as promotional, so I can assume less good faith here; I've updated my vote to delete. Dreamyshade (talk) 02:08, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: fails WP:NCORP. DrStrauss talk 09:10, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 21:00, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- sources are blogs, trivial mentions and / or WP:SPIP, failing WP:CORPDEPTH. Just a private company going about its business, no encyclopedic relevance here. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:38, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.